At some point next year, I expect CentOS Stream 9 to fork from Fedora, cloning our sources and that build configuration. I think it might be tempting to look at Fedora ELN as 'RHEL beta,' but I don't think that's quite the right lens - everything still follows Fedora's general direction and policies as set by the Fedora community except the specific build choices. It's something the RHEL team can develop actual ongoing expertise in. This is a big deal for RHEL because it means that doing that fork isn't a rare, always-a-new-experience occasion. It's not a different branch of our actual sources and build configuration files, but a continuous answer to "what if we started the next RHEL version from Fedora today?" This is a build of Fedora sources that is composed using build parameters emulating those used to make RHEL. I think it might officially be one of those acronyms that doesn't stand for anything, but think "'Enterprise Linux Next". That said, Miller sees two major areas where the changes "definitely impacts Fedora, and a third one I'm hopeful about."įirst, we have a new thing called " Fedora ELN.". Miller doesn't see Red Hat dropping Fedora or these areas. It's a little further away from RHEL and CentOS Stream, though, since there's not a major-version mapping."īut, what about Fedora and its role in RHEL? The areas, he mentions, after all, aren't mission-critical for Red Hat. Fedora has actually been using the Red Hat Bugzilla since the project joined Red Hat. The same goes for Fedora CoreOS and Fedora IoT.Īs for Fedora contributors and working on packaging or in other technical areas, Miller doesn't see any "real impact. If you're running Fedora Workstation or the Fedora KDE Plasma Spin or Fedora Xfce (or any of our other desktop offerings!), you can basically just ignore all of this drama. Fedora IoT has some overlap in aspirations of working at scale, but we're also interested in home hacking and the educational space. Likewise, RHEL for Edge is Red Hat's internet-of-things offering, and it's meant for enterprise use. Fedora Workstation is meant for those situations. For example, Red Hat's investment in the desktop is focused on enterprise needs, not so much on individual developers or students and other academic use cases. Fedora offers a lot of things that just aren't Red Hat's areas of attention for RHEL. So, what happens to Fedora? Miller said, much of what happens in:įedora-land just stays exactly as it has for the past decade. Of course, there's some learning curve, but the intention is for this stream to be as stable as the released RHEL product because being able to make it so literally is the value of Stream to Red Hat." It's just released in a … well, in a stream … rather than in a big dump every six months. What's actually happening, Miller stated, is "Everything that goes into CentOS Stream is actually approved for release to paying RHEL customers. "CentOS Stream," Miller said, "is continuous development of RHEL after the fork from Fedora." This is where a lot of miscommunication is happening with terms like "rolling-release" and "unstable development branch" getting kicked around. That's a problem and that's what CentOS Stream is meant to address. And, once that fork from Fedora happens, RHEL development traditionally has all been inside the Red Hat firewall, with the results seen in a restricted-access RHEL alpha, an RHEL beta that few people actually look at, suddenly a public release of the point-0 version, and then secret development of each subsequent point release. While obviously RHEL has been successful, when you do something only once every few years, it's hard to really get good at it: each time is like learning anew. "Fedora integrates thousands of "upstream" open-source projects into a unified distribution on a six-month release cadence, and every so often Red Hat takes that collection, forks it off, and produces RHEL." That will remain the same. But, Miller wants you to know that, contrary to rumor, Red Hat is not "canceling or pulling out of open source commitments in general, and from a Fedora perspective I just don't see that at all."įedora, just as it always has, will be the upstream for RHEL.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |